RESUMO
Background: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation seemingly suffered less effective therapeutic regimens in the absence of widely-accepted targeted drugs compared with other mutation types in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether these non-selective therapy schedules for KRAS mutation matters is still under debate. Correspondingly, we aimed to compare the long term expectancy of indicated therapeutic regimes and further explore the optimal schemes of KRAS mutated NSCLC in the absence of targeted drugs in this retrospective study cohort. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis among 66 patients diagnosed with KRAS-mutant advanced NSCLC from November 2018 to December 2020. These enrolled cases were divided into different subgroups in light of mutant isotypes, pathological characteristics, and therapeutic regimes to uncover indicated long-term survival benefits. Additionally, clinical outcomes of treatment schedules and interventional lines to KRAS-mutant NSCLC were described in detail. Results: This cohort enrolled 8 patients with stage IIIB (12.1%) and 58 patients with stage IV (87.9%) with the median age 62 years, ranging from 32 to 91 years old. Genetically, G12C conducted as the most common KRAS mutation type, accounting for 30.3%. Pemetrexed combined with platinum chemotherapy seemed to be a priority (72.7%), and chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy became an alternative (15.2%) in clinic. Performing further analysis of long-term survival of patients receiving different treatment methods indicated that the median overall survival (mOS) in first-line therapy with antiangiogenesis or untreated was 13 and 12 months, respectively (P=0.79). In the first-line regimen, median survival was 17 months for patients who received combined immune checkpoint inhibitors and 12 months for those who did not (P=0.34). The mOS was 20 months for those who had used immune checkpoint inhibitors and 12 months for those who had not (P=0.11). Survival analysis results of NSCLC patients with different KRAS mutation types showed the median survival time of patients with G12C mutation type and patients without with nonG12C mutation type was 19 and 12 months, respectively (P=0.37). Conclusions: In the absence of KRAS targeted drugs, available treatment plans failed to benefit KRAS mutant sufferers regardless of isotypes, making the KRAS-targeted drugs urgent.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Exudative pleural effusion (EPE) is one of the common pleural manifestations of various diseases. Differential diagnosis of EPE is imperative clinically as it identifies different causes of EPE, thereby, enabling effective treatments. Thoracoscopy is a useful tool for differential diagnosis of EPE; however, some patients refuse thoracoscopic examination due to its invasive nature. In addition, the specificity and sensitivity of existing routine tests of EPE are unsatisfactory. Therefore, there is a great need to establish an effective method for the differential diagnosis of EPE. METHODS: This study was a single-institution retrospective analysis of diagnostic efficiency of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) between March 2018 and September 2018. A total of 87 patients diagnosed with EPE were enrolled. All participants underwent diagnostic thoracentesis. The EPE was examined using biochemical, routine, microbiological, and cytological methods. Pathological cytology detection was necessary for those suspected of malignant PE. Benign PE originates in patients with pneumonia, empyema, and tuberculosis. The levels of CRP and PCT in EPE and serum were measured before treatment. Correlation analysis and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were conducted to determine the underlying relationship between levels of CRP and PCT, and for differential diagnosis. RESULTS: The ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity for the analysis of pleural fluid CRP (p-CRP) were higher (cut-off: 17.55 pg/mL; sensitivity: 75.00%, specificity: 83.90%) than that of serum CRP (s-CRP, cut-off: 23.90 pg/mL; sensitivity: 71.00%, specificity: 80.4%) in the differential diagnosis for EPE. However, the analysis of pleural fluid PCT (p-PCT) and serum PCT (s-PCT) did not demonstrate correlations with EPE. Combined analysis of p-CRP (cut-off: 17.55 mg/dL) with s-CRP (cut-off: 23.9 pg/mL) showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (88.4%) in diagnosing infectious EPE. CONCLUSIONS: The data support the close relationship between combined analysis of p-CRP with s-CRP and effective and accurate differential diagnosis of EPE, due to its higher sensitivity and specificity. However, as a highly sensitive marker for diagnosing bacterial infections, neither s-PCT nor p-PCT, showed correlations with the differential diagnosis of EPE.
RESUMO
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To identify potential miRNA involved in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) invasion and metastasis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>miRNA microarray was applied to compare the miRNA expression profile between SKOV-3ip and SKOV-3 cells. Bioinformatics programs (TargetScan, MicroCosm, PicTar and GO) were used to analyze the miRNA and their potential target genes. Real-time RT-PCR was used to confirm the results of microarray and for expanding detection in another paired EOC cell lines (HO-8910 and HO-8910PM).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Totally, expressions of 42 miRNA were found significantly different between SKOV-3ip and SKOV-3 cells. Among them, 10 miRNA were down-regulated, including let-7a, let-7f, miR-22 and miR-886-5p; while 32 were up-regulated, for example, let-7e and miR-519e. Bioinformatic analysis indicated that let-7a, let-7e, let-7f, miR-22 and miR-886-5p may be involved in cancer invasion and metastasis. Meanwhile, real-time RT-PCR confirmation and statistic analysis showed that let-7f and miR-22 expressions were significantly different between ovarian cancer cell lines with various invasive and metastatic capacity (P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The expression of let-7f and miR-22 is low in ovarian cancer cells with high invasive and metastatic capacity. It suggests that they are potential tumor suppressor genes. Further research on their role and mechanism is needed.</p>
